The longer it is between posts on this blog, the harder it is to decide what to write about. It’s tempting simply to post a list of things I’ve been doing by way of catching up, and to justify my absence. But that would be dull. So I’m going to skip the lot and just write about Chelsea.
In previous years I have gone on my own, or with a friend. Dave has declined on the grounds that the crowds will be insufferable. But he’s become something of a show gardening junkie and an increasingly confident plant admirer, so he broke his duck and came with me. Did he enjoy it? Well, you’ll have to ask him yourself, but he wants to come again next year, so it can’t have been too dreadful. Here he is helpfully comparing the hardiness of an array of Arisaemas for two lovely ladies.
The Cornwall garden was confusing. Gorgeous carved rivulet water feature – I loved that. But Meconopsis? In Cornwall, next to a sun-baked swimming pool? I don’t think so. The planting didn’t do it for me.
![](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-v70xUTga-_4/Tea3DMH2vQI/AAAAAAAABoU/ihKhd8rBes4/s320/Sarah%2BEberle%2Bs.jpg)
![](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-D5GOY_yFb4o/Tea3t2m__nI/AAAAAAAABoc/DLP4I5JhvNc/s320/Cleve4s.jpg)
I can clearly see why Cleve’s garden beat Luciano Guibbilei’s Laurent Perrier garden – I don’t understand why the Independent thinks otherwise. Yes the plant colours were stunningly blended. But it was nothing we haven’t seen before – a central path with prettily planted borders each side under trees leading to some kind of structure at the end. It was boring and unoriginal, I thought.
Which leads me, skipping neatly over the ones I didn’t really respond to, to Diarmuid’s Sky garden. I could do without the crane. A hydraulic pole would have been better. And Wonkovator was a truly stupid name for the pod. The florid planting flopping out of the inside of the pod looked a little out of kilter. But the garden itself – the yew and box mounds, the softly rippling Hakonechloa macra moving gently amongst the fixed topiary shapes. The green Hostas, the trees, the round, still pools and the steel walkway. I loved it all. I didn’t expect to, I expected it to be naff. But it wasn’t. It was fantastic and fantastical. It got the media’s attention and it deserved it.
In the Grand Pavillion, I fell for a beautifully simple display of box topiary and Euphorbia leucocephala (which I believe is marketed under the snappy pseudonym of ‘Silver Fog’). The stunning display of alpines at Kevock Plants’ stall bowled me over. Surely it deserved a gold? I know it’s a monocarpic perennial/annual but that Meconopsis punicea was an absolute beauty. I like some Heucheras, but increasingly prefer the ones with less showy leaves and more traditional Coral Bells type flowers. A trip down the road to Plantagogo is called for to stock up. Crug Farm Plants’s planthunter’s collection not only scooped a gold at the first attempt but the President’s medal as well. Just as at their nursery, I barely recognised a single plant on their display. Leaves me feeling a total amateur.
I’m beginning to imagine creating a display in the Pavillion one day. Especially since Dave’s up for it. One day.
Possibly the most mind-blowing display was the Singapore
3 Responses to “On not catching up, and Chelsea.”
Looking forward to the pictures![:)](http://suebeesley.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/simple-smile.png)
I didn't rate the Monaco garden – although I'd be well pleased if I'd booked a holiday villa and ended up with that. Cleve's I was never sure about from the first sketch of it I saw – it looked somehow a bit uninviting. It was early morning when I first saw it in the flesh and I liked it a lot but it wasn't until the sun came around and warmed the stone that I really, really loved it and thought it deserved best in show.
Totally agree with your other assessments.
Oops JD is me – I keep forgetting which blog I am logged in as.